 |
|
IVF - DONOR OOCYTE PROGRAM
1. Check JH,
Nowroozi K, Chase JS, Nazari A, Braithwate C: Comparison of pregnancy
rates following in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer between the
donors and recipients in a donor oocyte program. Journal of Assisted
Reproduction and Genetics 9(3):248-250, 1992.
2. Check JH,
Chase JS: Discrepancy in B-hCG levels in two separate pregnancies
resulting from fertilization of a common pool of oocytes. Assisted
Reproductive Technology/Andrology Supplement III 111-115, 1991.
3. Check JH,
Schubert B, Chase JS: Fetal outcome of triplets in a turner mosaic.
J Perinat Med 21:279-283, 1993.
4. Check JH,
Nowroozi K, Choe J, Lurie D, Dietterich C: The effect of endometrial
thickness and echo pattern on in vitro fertilization outcome in donor
oocyte-embryo transfer cycle. Fertil Steril 59:72-75, 1993.
5. Check JH,
Nowroozi K, Chase JS, Goldsmith G: Pregnancy rates in donors/recipients
using the same pool of oocytes. ARTA 3:49-51, 1992.
6. Check JH,
Choe J, Hoover L, Hourani CL, Summers DC, Benfer KM: Election to
be a donor in a shared oocyte program. ARTA 3:63-65, 1992.
7. Check JH,
Barnea ER, Shapse DB, Lurie D, Lauer C, Vetter BH: Origin of first
trimester 17-hydroxyprogesterone levels as determined in pregnancies
by donor oocyte fertilization. Gynecol Obstet Invest 36:136-140,
1993.
8. Check JH,
Askari HA, Choe J, Baker A, Adelson H: The effect of the age of
the recipients on pregnancy rates following donor-oocyte replacement.
J Assist Reprod and Genetics 10:137-140, 1993.
9. Check JH,
Hourani C, Choe JK, Callan C, Adelson HG: Pregnancy rates in donors
versus recipients according to the serum progesterone level at time
of human chorionic gonadotropin in a shared oocyte program. Fertil
Steril 61:262-264, 1994.
10. Check JH,
Askari HA, Fisher C, Vanaman L: The use of a shared donor oocyte
program to evaluate the effect of uterine senescence. Fertil Steril
61:252-256, 1994.
11. Chase JS,
Nazari A, Baker A, Check JH, Choe J: Comparison of pregnancy rates
in donors compared with recipients in a shared oocyte program.
Parthenon Publishing, Fertility & Sterility Progress in Research
and Practice, Proceedings of XIV World Congress on Fertility and Sterility,
Caracas, November 1992, Chapter 51, page 481-484, 1994.
12. Check JH,
Nowroozi K, Barnea ER, Shaw KJ, Sauer MV: Successful delivery after
age fifty: a report of two cases as a result of oocyte donation. Obstet
Gynecol 81:835-836, 1993.
13. Check JH:
The use of the donor oocyte program to evaluate embryo implantation.
The Human Endometrium, Edited by C. Bulletti, E. Gurpride, C. Flamigni.
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Volume 734 pages 198-208,
1994.
14. Check JH,
O’Shaughnessy A, Lurie D, Fisher C, Adelson HG: Evaluation
of the mechanism for higher pregnancy rates in donor oocyte recipients
by comparison of fresh with frozen embryo transfer pregnancy rates
in a shared oocyte program. Human Reproduction 10(11):3022-3027,
1995.
15. Check JH:
Letter to the Editor - Differential age of the endometrium.
Fertil Steril 66:174-175, 1996.
16. Perkins
S, Check JH, Choe JK, Lurie D, Swenson K: The donation of supernumerary
cryopreserved embryos to women in ovarian failure yields excellent
pregnancy and implantation rates. In: In Vitro Fertilization and
Human Reproductive Genetics, Proceedings of the 11th World Congress
on In Vitro Fertilization and Human Reproductive Genetics. Monduzzi
Editore. Pgs 357-360, 1999.
17. Kaplan H,
Choe JK, Check JH, Fox F, Perkins S: An oocyte recipient program
may be successful even if the source of oocyte is infertile women.
In: In Vitro Fertilization and Human Reproductive Genetics, Proceedings
of the 11th World Congress on In Vitro Fertilization and Human Reproductive
Genetics. Monduzzi Editore. Pgs 375-378, 1999.
18. Check JH,
Kiefer D, Summers-Chase D, Choe JK, Fox F: Transferring at least
one embryo with eight blastomeres at 72 hours improves prognosis of
donor oocyte recipients receiving fresh embryos but not frozen-thawed
embryos. Reprinted from: 12th World Congress on In Vitro Fertilization
and Molecular Reproduction, Ed. Anibal A. Acosta, Monduzzi Editore,
International Proceedings Division. Pgs. 111-115, 2002.
19. Check JH,
Fox F, Krotec JW, Davies E, Deperro D: An evaluation of the
efficacy of using oocyte donors aged 36-39. Clin Exp Obst Gyn
30:201-202, 2003.
20. Check JH,
Fox F, Deperro D, Davies E, Krotec JW: Efficacy of sharing oocytes
from compensated donors between two recipients. Clin Exp Obst Gyn
30:199-200, 2003.
21. Check JH,
Fox F, Choe JK, Krotec JW, Nazari A: Sharing of oocytes from
infertile versus paid donors results in similar pregnancy and
implantation rates. Fertil Steril 81:703-704, 2004.
22. Check JH,
Wilson C, Krotec JW, Choe JK, Nazari A: The feasibility of embryo
donation. Fertil Steril 81:452-453, 2004.
23.
Wang W, Check JH: Effect of corporal fibroids on outcome following
embryo transfer in donor-oocyte recipients. Clin Exp Obst Gyn
31:263-264, 2004.
24.
Davies E, Katsoff B, Check JH, Fox F, Choe JK: Pregnancy rates in
donor egg recipients according to maximum blastomere number.
In: In Vitro Fertilization and Assisted Reproduction & Genetics,
Proceedings of the 13th World Congress on In Vitro Fertilization and
Assisted Reproduction & Genetics. Monduzzi Editore. Pgs.
115-118, 2005.
25.
Katsoff B, Check JH, Fox F, choe JK, Iacone K: A reassessment of
comparative pregnancy and implantation rates following embryo transfer
in recipients vs. their infertile donor also trying to conceive in the
background of performing salpingectomy for hydrosalpinx. Clin Exp Obst Gyn
33:143-144, 2006.
|
|
 |
 |
